DATE: 24/09/2026

TIME (GMT): 18:00

ERA: Modern

MAP(S): Maksniemi

TYPE: COOP

TEAMSPEAK: ts1.biaarma.com

GAME: Arma 3

EVENT: Official

AUTHOR(S): Doctor

SLOTS: 66 / 92

---

RATING: not rated yet! (0)

---

1. SITUATION

The Russian offensive into Estonia has culminated. During the opening phase of the invasion, Russian forces exploited surprise and temporary local superiority to penetrate rapidly west from the border. Estonian delaying actions subsequently forced the leading formations to fight through successive prepared positions, while NATO air-mobile raids struck aviation, artillery, engineers, logistics and armoured reserves during the period in which the Russian force was attempting to reorganise. The cumulative effect has been to deprive the Russian advance of the momentum required to continue its original offensive plan.

The front is now unstable. Russian forces retain substantial combat power and continue to occupy territory seized during the first two days of fighting, but their forward formations are increasingly separated from the support structure required to sustain another major advance. NATO and Estonian forces have simultaneously begun local counterattacks along several axes, creating a series of battles across what had previously been a relatively coherent Russian advance. The immediate opportunity is to turn those local actions into a wider operational reversal.

Russian forces occupying the central MSR and adjoining urban area form an important part of the enemy's remaining forward position. If this force can be defeated and the northern route reopened, NATO elements will gain the freedom of manoeuvre required to continue east and south against Russian formations whose withdrawal routes are becoming increasingly vulnerable. Charlie Company, 237th Battalion, will form the principal assault force on this axis.

The operation will begin with a deliberate attack against the Russian blocking force on the MSR. Once the route has been secured and the mine obstacle on the northern axis cleared, the battalion will continue into the urban area to the south, clearing Russian forces sector by sector and ultimately retaking the former Estonian electronic-warfare headquarters. Success will contribute directly to the wider effort to isolate the Russian forward force and create the conditions for its encirclement.

2. ENEMY FORCES

Russian forces in the immediate AO are assessed to consist of a substantial mixed mechanised and armoured grouping reinforced by dismounted infantry. ISR indicates that the enemy has used the pause in offensive operations to establish hasty defensive positions along the MSR and eastern approaches. The force includes main battle tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, armoured personnel carriers, reconnaissance vehicles and short-range air-defence systems supported by a large infantry component.

The composition of the blocking force suggests that Russian commanders have assembled available vehicles and personnel from several formations rather than establishing a fresh, doctrinally organised defensive group. This does not make the position weak. On the contrary, units that previously formed part of the assault echelon now have a strong incentive to prevent a NATO breakthrough which could compromise the withdrawal or resupply of forces further west.

Recent SIGINT indicates considerable Russian tactical communications activity around the MSR and town, but the pattern is less coherent than during the first day of the invasion. Traffic is consistent with units attempting to reorganise, establish local command relationships and prepare defensive sectors after sustaining disruption to their original command and support structure. NATO intelligence assesses that Russian commanders understand the possibility of a counterattack and are attempting to create enough depth to prevent a rapid NATO exploitation.

The enemy should therefore be expected to fight aggressively from prepared positions. Anti-armour teams, machine guns and dismounted infantry are likely to operate from field fortifications and covered positions around the road network while tanks and infantry fighting vehicles engage from greater depth. Russian forces possess sufficient armoured strength to conduct local counterattacks where they identify an exposed NATO flank or stalled assault.

Indirect-fire capability has been reduced by previous NATO actions but should not be assumed to have been eliminated. Russian forces may retain access to mortars, artillery or supporting systems outside the immediate AO. Units remaining static for extended periods after being identified should therefore expect hostile indirect fire.

3. THE NORTHERN MSR

The Russian blocking position on the MSR represents the first major obstacle to the counterattack. The enemy has occupied an area that was previously prepared by Estonian forces as part of the defensive belt used during the initial withdrawal. Existing fieldworks, damaged infrastructure and terrain that previously assisted the Estonian defence are now being used against NATO forces advancing east.

ISR indicates a strong concentration of armour and infantry across the position. The enemy is assessed to have sufficient depth to absorb an initial attack and should not be treated as a single line of trenches that will collapse once penetrated. Armour may be concealed behind the forward infantry positions and committed against NATO vehicles once the assault becomes fixed.

The primary requirement is to defeat the blocking force rather than merely force it away from the road. Russian troops allowed to withdraw intact into the urban area would increase the strength of subsequent defensive positions and unnecessarily prolong the operation. Where practical, Charlie Company should therefore use manoeuvre and supporting fires to prevent an orderly Russian disengagement.

4. MINEFIELD AND ROUTE CLEARANCE

A significant anti-tank minefield remains across the northern MSR. The obstacle was originally established by Estonian forces during the defensive phase of the campaign. Russian combat engineers subsequently attempted to clear the route but were prevented from completing the task during NATO disruption operations. Intelligence indicates that the Russians have since incorporated and reinforced the existing minefield as part of their own defensive plan.

The obstacle must now be cleared sufficiently to allow NATO mechanised forces and follow-on elements to pass safely. This task falls principally to the attached logistics and engineering capability and should be conducted in coordination with the assault on the Russian defensive position. Mine clearance personnel should not be committed forward until enemy direct-fire positions capable of covering the obstacle have been suppressed or destroyed.

The minefield is operationally significant beyond the immediate company battle. Until the northern MSR is reopened, heavier NATO forces cannot exploit the breakthrough at the speed required to threaten Russian withdrawal routes. Route clearance is therefore not a secondary administrative task; it is an essential component of the counterattack.

5. URBAN DEFENCE

Following the defeat of the MSR blocking force, Charlie Company will advance against Russian forces occupying the town to the south. The enemy has established a foothold throughout the urban area and appears to have divided the defence into several mutually supporting sectors.

The northern sector forms the initial urban objective. Russian infantry should be expected to use houses, industrial structures, compounds and vegetation to create short-range defensive positions. The terrain will reduce many of the advantages provided by NATO armoured vehicles and increase the importance of dismounted infantry, supporting machine guns and careful coordination between squads.

The central sector is expected to contain a greater concentration of surviving Russian personnel as forces withdraw from the northern portion of the town. Commanders should assume that each successful NATO advance will compress surviving defenders into the remaining sectors unless withdrawal routes are effectively controlled. The enemy may therefore become progressively more concentrated even as the amount of ground under Russian control decreases.

The final objective encompasses the southern sector and the former Estonian EW headquarters. The site was occupied and used during the earlier phases of the campaign and remains tactically important because of its infrastructure and location. Russian troops defending this area should understand that they are close to losing the principal route out of the immediate sector and may therefore offer particularly determined resistance.

6. ENEMY INTENT

NATO intelligence assesses that the immediate Russian objective is no longer the continuation of the original offensive. The enemy's priority is now to prevent NATO from achieving a breakthrough before the Russian forward formations can reorganise or withdraw into a more defensible posture.

The force on the MSR is therefore performing an operationally important blocking mission. Every hour it remains intact provides Russian headquarters with additional time to move damaged formations, logistics vehicles and surviving combat units away from the developing threat of encirclement.

Within the town, Russian commanders are expected to trade ground for time where necessary while using dense terrain to impose casualties and slow NATO movement. If a controlled withdrawal becomes impossible, isolated elements may choose to defend in place rather than attempt movement across terrain already exposed to NATO observation and fires.

The most dangerous enemy course of action would be a local armoured counterattack against Charlie Company while the mechanised force is reorganising after breaking the initial defensive line. Commanders should therefore maintain anti-armour security throughout the exploitation phase and avoid allowing the entire company to become canalised along the MSR.

7. FRIENDLY FORCES

The principal manoeuvre force is Charlie Company, 237th Battalion, organised as a mechanised infantry company with Company Headquarters and two infantry platoons. The company operates a substantial fleet of M2A3 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, allowing infantry elements to maintain pace with the armoured attack while retaining significant organic direct-fire capability.

Each platoon contains two rifle squads, with two Bradley's per squad, dedicated machine-gun and anti-armour weapons, supported by dedicated crewmen. The infantry should normally fight dismounted in restrictive or urban terrain while vehicles provide overwatch and direct-fire support from positions that minimise exposure to Russian anti-tank weapons.

An attached British weapons section provides additional general-purpose and light machine-gun capability and has access to a Warrior infantry fighting vehicle. This element is particularly suitable for establishing support-by-fire positions, reinforcing infantry assaults and providing sustained suppressive fire during movement between defensive belts.

Charlie Company is reinforced by an attached M1A2 Abrams element comprising four tanks. The tanks represent the company's principal capability against Russian heavy armour and should be used to create local overmatch rather than dispersed individually across the entire frontage. The armoured element can provide decisive direct fire against enemy tanks, fortified positions and vehicles encountered during the initial breakthrough, but should be protected from close-range anti-armour teams when operating in urban terrain.

Additional wheeled reconnaissance and support vehicles are available to the battalion, including Stryker reconnaissance vehicles and a protected weapons platform. These assets provide further mobility and observation capability but should not substitute for deliberate infantry reconnaissance where terrain restricts vehicle movement.

8. COMBAT SUPPORT

The attached 223 Artillery Battery provides a two-launcher HIMARS capability. This represents the principal long-range fires asset directly supporting the operation and should be reserved for targets whose destruction materially influences the battle. Suitable targets include concentrated armour, identified command locations, major defensive concentrations and Russian forces attempting to mass for counterattack.

The 226 Air-Defence Platoon provides two Avenger short-range air-defence systems. Russian aviation suffered significant disruption during earlier NATO actions, but residual fixed-wing, rotary-wing and unmanned threats remain possible. The Avengers should therefore remain positioned to protect the main mechanised force and supporting artillery without unnecessarily exposing themselves on the forward edge of the battle.

A four-person French mechanised logistics team is attached to support the force. The team provides vehicle and logistical support essential to maintaining the mechanised assault. The previous phase of the campaign demonstrated the vulnerability of an offensive force whose fuel, repair and recovery systems become disrupted; NATO commanders are not to repeat the same mistake. Recovery and resupply should keep pace with the advance without becoming concentrated unnecessarily within range of Russian fires.

Medical and ammunition resupply is available within the battalion support area. Commanders should plan replenishment before committing to the urban phase, as the transition from the initial mechanised attack into prolonged close combat is likely to generate increased ammunition expenditure and casualties.

9. TERRAIN AND WEATHER

The initial objective lies along a predominantly east-west MSR surrounded by forest and relatively open ground. The road provides excellent mobility for mechanised forces but creates predictable avenues of approach and places vehicles at risk from mines and long-range anti-armour fires. The surrounding forest provides opportunities for infantry infiltration and flank manoeuvre but restricts observation and may conceal Russian anti-tank teams.

Hasty defensive works already exist throughout portions of the area. Many were originally constructed by Estonian forces during the previous delaying action and have subsequently been occupied or adapted by the Russians. NATO forces should therefore expect well-sited positions that take advantage of the terrain rather than improvised defences established without preparation.

The urban area further south presents a fundamentally different tactical problem. Engagement ranges will shorten considerably, lines of sight will become fragmented and Russian infantry will have numerous opportunities to engage vehicles from concealed positions. Bradley and Abrams crews should avoid advancing significantly ahead of dismounted infantry once the force enters built-up terrain.

Operations commence at approximately 0800 hrs. Weather is forecast to remain generally favourable, with light cloud, very light winds and no significant fog or precipitation. Visibility will be good throughout the morning. These conditions favour NATO observation and supporting fires but equally permit Russian defenders to identify exposed movement over considerable distances.

10. MISSION

Charlie Company, 237th Battalion, supported by attached armour, fires, air defence and logistics elements, attacks east to defeat the Russian mechanised and armoured force blocking the MSR, clears the northern route for follow-on NATO forces, and subsequently advances south through the urban area to destroy remaining Russian resistance and retake the former Estonian EW headquarters.

The purpose of the operation is to break the Russian defensive position, restore NATO freedom of manoeuvre and contribute to the isolation of Russian forces remaining forward of the developing NATO counterattack.

11. COMMANDER'S INTENT

The purpose of LIBERTAS is to convert the Russian loss of offensive momentum into a decisive NATO advantage. The enemy has spent the previous two days attempting to restore an offensive that has repeatedly been delayed and disrupted. He must not now be allowed the time required to establish a stable defensive line.

Charlie Company will achieve this by concentrating combat power against the Russian blocking position, opening the MSR rapidly and maintaining pressure into the urban area before surviving Russian forces can reorganise. The operation should be aggressive, but speed is not to be confused with recklessness. The Russian force remains heavily armed and possesses enough armour to punish unsupported or poorly coordinated movement.

Mechanised infantry, tanks, supporting weapons and fires are to operate as a combined force. Infantry will identify and clear threats that vehicles cannot safely approach; Bradleys will provide protected mobility and direct-fire support; Abrams will defeat enemy armour and hardened positions; HIMARS will shape high-value targets beyond effective direct-fire range; and logistics elements will maintain the momentum required for continued exploitation.

The desired end state is that the Russian blocking force on the MSR has been destroyed or rendered combat ineffective, the northern mine obstacle has been breached and the route reopened, Russian troops have been cleared from the town and former EW headquarters, and 237th Battalion retains sufficient combat power to exploit the breakthrough as part of the wider NATO counterattack.

12. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS

The operation will be conducted in three broad phases. During Phase One, Charlie Company will attack the Russian defensive position along the MSR. Reconnaissance and direct observation should identify enemy armour, anti-tank positions and principal infantry concentrations before the company commits its main force. Tanks and Bradleys should establish local fire superiority while dismounted infantry clears positions unsuitable for engagement by vehicles. HIMARS may be employed against significant concentrations where the expected effect justifies expenditure.

The company should seek to create a breach rather than advance evenly across the entire Russian frontage. Once a weak point has been identified, combat power should be concentrated sufficiently to overwhelm it, after which manoeuvre elements can attack the remaining Russian positions from less favourable directions. The enemy should not be given an opportunity to convert every prepared position into a separate deliberate assault.

During Phase Two, Charlie Company will advance into the urban area and clear the northern, central and southern sectors in succession. The company should expect resistance to become increasingly concentrated as Russian forces are compressed into the remaining ground. Platoons should maintain sufficient depth to allow one element to clear while another provides security, support and the ability to respond to enemy counterattack.

The former EW headquarters forms the culminating objective. Once the southern sector and headquarters have been secured, Charlie Company will consolidate, establish security against remaining Russian forces and prepare for further battalion operations.